|
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly
CNBC’s Burnett Finds ‘Silver
Lining’ in High Energy Prices; ABC Eager to Sound Stagflation Siren;
Climate Change Conference Mocked by The New York Times
March 5, 2008
The Good
CNBC’s Erin
Burnett found an economic “silver lining”
on NBC’s February 29 “Today.” Higher energy prices are hitting
some in the pocket, but that’s also causing some companies to hire.
“Keep in mind that we did look around for a silver
lining, if there was one, to the surge that we’re seeing in prices
for oil that will cause record prices at the pump,” Burnett said
following a report on a “surge” in oil and other commodity prices.
“And that is: some companies are hiring.”
“Companies that do anything related to oil, Natalie,
they’re hiring,” Burnett said, addressing anchor Natalie Morales.
“[I] talked to the CEO of Fluor yesterday. He said he’s hiring more
than 3,000 people in the United States this year. Job creation is
what we need right now so we’ll take that if we can get it.”
Burnett’s attempt to balance her reporting by including
a little bit of good news was certainly a step in a balanced
direction.
The Bad
Nothing
like the cheery decade of the 1970s - disco dancing, "Animal House," Farrah Fawcett and a buzz word to describe the economy -
stagflation. While the '70s may be over, the media have reincarnated
the term.
After a
disappointing spike in inflation, the producer price index (PPI), by
1.0 percent in January, and a rise in core inflation (with food and
energy costs excluded), rising 0.4 percent on Tuesday,
the media have deemed it necessary to sound the stagflation siren.
"Now, to
the economy," ABC "World News" anchor Charles Gibson said on
February 26. "And a word not heard since the 1970s - stagflation.
That occurs when prices go up just as the economy slows down -
stagnation plus inflation. And the government REPORTED TODAY that
wholesale prices shot up 1 percent in January and are now up almost
7.5 percent in the past 12 months."
"Just
today, oil set a record high - a barrel of crude at just over $100,"
continued ABC correspondent David Muir. "And what so worries
economists, is that potential dynamic - stagflation."
Although
economic growth has tapered off, from 3.9 percent in the third
quarter of 2007 to estimates of 0.6 percent in the fourth quarter of
2007 - stagflation takes time to develop according to Brian Wesbury,
an economist for First Trust Advisors, L.P.
"Let me
just put it this way, stagflation comes from the 1970s," Wesbury
said
on CNBC's February 21 "Power Lunch." "A lot of people throw this
word around. They don't know what they're talking about. It takes a
long time for stagflation to develop. It was because every time the
economy kind of faltered in the '70s, we cut interest rates, like we
just did, and that drove inflation higher. And then, when we raised
interest rates to kind of fight inflation, that hurt the economy -
then we cut interest rate really fast again."
The Ugly
It’s not much
of a surprise to see The New York Times rip on anything critical of
manmade global warming theories.
Times’ reporter Andrew Revkin did just that on March 4.
Revkin, whose “Reporter’s Notebook” (read: opinion
column) piece on the conference appeared on A20 in his paper. He
wrote that conference speakers were “trying hard to prove that they
had unraveled the established science showing that humans are
warming the world in potentially disruptive ways.”
He said a diversity of views among scientists – the
conference features voices from across the global warming spectrum,
especially on the causes of climate change – was a “challenge” for
the conference’s mission. Maybe that explains why the media include
so little diversity in their reports: it poses a “challenge”?
But, Revkin included a note about conference sponsor
Heartland Institute’s funding and said the group’s “antiregulatory
philosophy has long been embraced by, and financially supported by,
various industries and conservative donors.”
Revkin
concluded his column by coyly noting that “when an organizer made an
announcement asking all of the scientists in the large hall to move
to the front for a group picture, 19 men did so,” implying that only
19 scientists were at the conference. If Revkin had paid closer
attention, or simply asked conference organizers about the speakers
and attendees, he would have learned that about 100 scientists
participated in the conference. Those included experts on
meteorology, climatology, geology, and physics, representing at
least 30 universities.
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly tracks the best and worst media
coverage of business and economics. Readers are invited to submit
suggestions or news tips to Staff Writer Jeff Poor at
jpoor@mediaresearch.org.
|