Visit the Media Research Center

Business & Media Institute

 


The Good, the Bad & the Ugly
Strong U.S. economy; ABC weighed and found lacking on calorie-counting; IBD joins other media in snowing public on housing news.

Jan. 4, 2005

     Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) wins both The Good and The Ugly for separate stories on its front page, while “Good Morning America’s” super-sized math mistake in its plug for a weight loss challenge garners it the first Bad award of 2006.

The Good
     The January 3 Investor’s Business Daily ranked the resilient U.S. economy’s strength as the No. 3 story of 2005. Putting everything into perspective, IBD accomplished in a few paragraphs a mature perspective on the economy other media missed throughout the entire year.

     “If you told economists three years ago that in 2005 the U.S. would be immersed in a global war on terror, experience record highs in oil prices and finish the year with a 13th straight interest rate hike by the Federal Reserve, you might have been asked: And what month did the recession begin,” noted the editors.

     The daily business publication went on to give credit in part to the Bush tax cuts: “President Bush's three tax cuts — culminating in 2003’s broad-based cuts in taxes on income, capital gains and savings — deserve much of the credit. Since those tax cuts went into effect nine quarters ago, the U.S. economy has grown on average at a 4.5% annual rate. In the nine quarters before the tax cuts, the average was 1.1%.”

The Bad
     Mix a drive-through approach to TV journalism with gimmicky marketing and you get the 2006 fitness kick for “Good Morning America”: getting Americans to lose 50 million pounds in one year. But in their rush to feel the burn, ABC’s weight watchers underestimated the number of cheeseburgers they want Americans to give up. The Business & Media Institute reported on December 27 how “ABC went for thin math and came up with a hefty mistake” by assuming that.

The Ugly
     Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) joined other outlets such as the AP and Bloomberg in blowing hot air on the so-called “housing bubble.” A front page story on December 27 addressed a drop in month-to-month home sales in November. While IBD hyped the monthly drop as a sign of a possibly cooling housing market, it ignored that October had seen a very strong month-to-month increase in sales and that home sales in November 2005 were up strongly from the same time in 2004. In an otherwise negative piece on the housing market, The Washington Post’s Kirstin Downey noted in her December 24 article that even with the lower November sales numbers that “about 1.25 million new single-family homes will be sold in 2005, up from the record-breaking 1.2 million sold in 2004.”

The Good, the Bad & the Ugly tracks the best and worst media coverage of business and economics. Readers are invited to submit suggestions or news tips to staff writer Ken Shepherd at kshepherd@mediaresearch.org.